Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:55
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What is the top-rated beach resort in Bali, Indonesia according to TripAdvisor reviews?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How do you get a teenage boy to care about hygiene?
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why would the United States need a fleet of the F-47 fighter jet fielded in the 2030s?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
US Inflation to Tick Higher as Tariffs Reach Consumers - Bloomberg
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What led Megan to marry into the Royal Family despite her successful acting career in Hollywood?
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump insults Powell again as another top Fed official joins the call to lower interest rates - CNN